The allegations read: Christopher lee goslin was named in a customer complaint that asserted the following causes of action: 1) violation of standards of reasonable basis suitability (nasd rule 2310; finra rule 2310(b)), and just and equitable principles of trade (finra rule 2010); 2) fraud, misleading statements, misleading omissions of material information (nasd rule 2210(d)(1)), and just and equitable principles of trade (finra rule 2010); 3) breach of fiduciary duty; 4) negligent misrepresentation; 5) negligence; 6) breach of contract and warranty, and third party beneficiary breach of contract; 7) breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing; 8) elder abuse; 9) aiding and abetting financial elder abuse; and 10) failure to supervise (nasd rule 3010).
